Monday, April 3, 2017

Straw Men

We, humans, apparently love to give names that are in diametric opposition to the nature of what is being named. Like 'Little John' for someone who towers so high that you need a phone to speak with him even when you are...err...face-to-face, if the phrase may be used even when the two faces are separated by a meter of height. Like 'Common Sense' for the one thing that is so uncommon that people generally react surprised and hurt if they find it in what someone says to them.

So, it is no wonder that everyone speaks of logic, assumes that he is behaving, thinking and speaking logically...and the list of logical fallacies is longer than almost any laundry list you can think of. In fact, it is quite likely that if we blanked out all that is illogical in what is spoken in the world, the world may well be so silent that one would be justified in thinking that it is populated by deaf-mutes.

This straw man thing, though, which we seem to have carried into urban areas in a sort of nostalgia for the rural scarecrows, is so widely prevalent that its absence can single-handedly mute almost every single verbal bully in your vicinity. There is no such mute button, alas, and so...

"This demonetization policy could have been better implemented."
"You are an anti-national supporting the criminals and the corrupt."

Ah! You are not even questioning the impact of the policy, only questioning the implementation so how does it tell the other guy that you are opposing the policy in order to let criminals and the corrupt go scot-free? This sort of thing is a typical use of the 'Straw Man'. You avoid discussing the issue of implementation by distorting the comment and arguing against that distortion rather than the original comment.

"Shut down all illegal abattoirs"
"I am Hindu but I should be free to eat what I want"

Of course, except if you want to turn cannibal. But, pray, why is shutting down illegal slaughterhouses an impediment to your eating habits? Question the implementation if the implementation is spreading beyond the 'illegal' but what in THIS order itself makes it seem like it is against your eating habits? To claim limitation of freedom WHERE it is being limited is logical. To claim it where it is NOT is a Straw Man.

Straw men, though, practically outnumber real men and women in the world. You can hardly wish someone 'Good Morning' without someone getting on your case - "Why do you want only the morning to be good?" You cannot warn someone about even a fire hazard without someone else spouting, "So what? Would you want humanity to go back to hanging from trees and being afraid of fire?" My nightmares are full of countries where Straw Men march up and down, vote in people to power, set the rules by which we need to live.

And I wake up and find that...maybe I am not just dreaming after all.

8 comments:

  1. Powerful post. I just love the way you present something that is as important as this in your own charming way..the writing style is just amazing

    ReplyDelete
  2. A bit more scathing than your usual humourous undertones of denoting anything. Not that I mind. Good piece, Suresh. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Ritesh! Doesn't do to get too mono-tonal, you tend to get accused of being monotonous that way :)

      Delete
  3. New term for me Suresh...All debates on Tv should be renamed as battle of the straw men.... What do u say? Is it ok to use it in plural btw?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The 'Straw Man' IS a defined logical fallacy or a manipulative technique to carry your point. Instead of arguing the merits of what the other person has said, you redefine what he has said in a distorted manner - create a 'straw man' in the place of the real issue - and demolish that straw man, instead of the real issue.

      I was being facetious when I said so many straw men were moving around - in the sense that the world was full of people creating 'Straw Man' distortions of what other said. In the strict logical sense, you should be saying 'Straw Man' arguments or some such and not 'Straw Men' but then...

      Delete
  4. Straw men definitely can be more easily swayed and highly inflammable too!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A Straw Man is easier to demolish, which is why you distort the other chap's POV into an easily ridiculed and destroyed 'Straw Man'. :)

      Delete