Courage
has normally, and instinctively, been identified with physical courage.
Physical courage is more common among people than what I choose to call Social
courage. By Social courage I mean the courage to stick by your value systems
regardless of the fact that it may cause you to lose the respect of society.
Supposing
you see a group of your friends bullying a young boy! Would you join them or
stop them? The tamasik person would
join them but both the Rajasik and Satvik persons would try to stop them
even if that gets them ostracized from their group.
What,
then, if your group of friends are engaged in a fight with another group of
people? The tamasik person would join
them, of course, if he can see no way of escaping the battle unseen. The Rajasik person would join the battle
with his friends either because he is bound by personal loyalties or because to
not do so would cause him to be labeled a coward and a traitor. The Satvik person would either try to stop
the battle or join the side that is fighting for a just cause even if it is the
side of the others. Thus, in the Ramayana, Ravan’s brother Kumbakarn fights
against Ram, even when he knew it was Ravan who was in the wrong, as an
exemplar of a Rajasik person. The Satvik Vibhishan, on the other hand,
attempts to stop Ravan from battling Ram, despite being repeatedly insulted,
and then joins hands with the just cause.
The
fear of Scoiety’s disapprobation is a far stronger fear than physical fear.
What armies call esprit de corps is a
way of ensuring that soldiers would rather face death or disablement in battle
than the contempt of their peers. In fact, many a noble deed as well as many an
atrocity has been committed by people – against their own personal inclinations
– out of fear of social disapprobation. Social courage is, therefore, rarer
than physical courage.
Is
that all there is to courage then? Physical and Social courage anchor behavior!
It requires what I would call Moral courage to anchor your feelings. To be able
to love when love has been repaid with disdain; to be able to trust when trust
has been repaid with betrayal; to be able to be compassionate when compassion
has been repaid with contempt and to be able to be truthful when truth has been
repaid with disbelief requires a far higher and rarer order of courage. Please
understand that I do not mean that you should love the person who treated you
with disdain, trust the person who betrayed you etc. That is not courage but
folly. What I meant was that you need rare courage to still be able to meet
other people in life with an open mind and without letting your past
experiences embitter you. This sort of courage is exclusively the province of
the Satvik person.
Situations
in life do not conveniently fall into categories. A physical confrontation may
(and probably will) have social consequences – as in fisticuffs with the thug
leading to a police case and, therefore, social disapprobation. A social
confrontation would probably have physical consequences – as in standing up for
a co-worker losing you your job and leading to problems of survival. All
confrontations affect the realm of the emotions and, thus, have moral
consequences. A good Social system is one where desirable actions by members of
that Society do not lead to undesirable consequences and undesirable actions
necessarily and inevitably lead to undesirable consequences. Social systems
should not operate by depending on individual acts of courage.
People
do not slot themselves conveniently into boxes either. Thus, a person with
great physical courage may well have little Social courage and someone with no
Physical courage may exhibit great Social courage. To know the fears that stop
you from doing the right thing is to be able to confront those fears and to
win. A good individual is one who stays true to his value systems regardless of
consequences and even if the Society he lives in is dysfunctional.
In
the past, a great deal of premium was placed on courage. Rightly so, since
without courage none of our other virtues would stand the test of Life.
You have explained abot so many -siks its become a classic! You rock on the bedrock of your blog!
ReplyDeleteHa! Ha!Ha! I see the point about that Evangelist comment. I did not intend this as a plug for Hinduism. I was only explaining people in the Hindu metaphor rather than the usual western metaphors.
DeleteThanks for the generous compliments, even if totally undeserved by me.
Hi Suresh
ReplyDeleteThe line "To be able to love when love has been repaid with disdain; to be able to trust when trust has been repaid with betrayal; to be able to be compassionate when compassion has been repaid with contempt and to be able to be truthful when truth has been repaid with disbelief requires a far higher and rarer order of courage." is awesome and quotable...Can I quote it somewhere if I get a chance? I simply love the way it sounds and the meaning it conveys.
Hi Jaish! I'd be honoured to be quoted...of course you can!
Deleteokie, now we are discussing other forms of courage. the entire thing is little heavy for someone like me to comprehend :). all i can say is - you just rocked with this post :)
ReplyDeletewill come back later today once i get up and will read that short story. you know how lazy i am :D
Hi Debs! Yeah, I know how lazy you are , or claim to be:) Thanks for coming in, nevertheless, and complimenting.
DeleteOh yes, you are absolutely right. It requires courage to stand up for what is right even though a social group or society may ostracize you. These days diplomats abound. Most don't fight a battle for another even if just and right. On the contrary, you see people doing wrong, being arrogant about their wrongdoing and their friends and "well wishers" turn a blind eye to it as if nothing wrong has transpired. Such are the ways of this world.
ReplyDeleteSuch, indeed, are the ways of the world sadly Rachna!
Delete