Monday, April 28, 2014

More contradictory proverbs?

It seems to me that some things, which are said for effect, tend to become proverbs and end up giving an impression of being in contradiction of other proverbs. People do say things to suit the psychology of the other person in order to get them to do what is necessary AND, when you deal with people, you do not always say what you mean. I know it seems to defeat the very purpose of communication but what can you do? The human race may be 'sapient' but totally lacks common-sense. (Another of those inherent stupidities of communication. You call a thing 'common' sense when you know full well that there are few things more uncommon in this world.)

I may be wrong (NO! I am NOT always wrong!) but it seems to me that some of these proverbs are more 'contrarian' proverbs - in the sense that they were intended to ensure that the recipient did the exact opposite of what you told him to do. Take "Never judge a book by the cover" for example. Everyone and his aunt knows that it is flatly against every single instinct that humans possess. Whatever else of the bestial nature has been rubbed out, what has not is the idea that anything that looks different is an enemy. So, where does one get off talking about not judging things by looks?

In all probability, the chap who first used it was talking to his recalcitrant teenage son, who would, naturally, do the opposite of what his parents told him to do. The 'sapient' father, of course, told the son to do the opposite of what he (the father) wanted him (the son) to do and less sapient successors took it as literal advice. Not that anyone in all the subsequent generations ever paid more than lip service to it - as witness the epidemic of fairness creams raging through the world.

So, yes, "Clothes make a man" comes closer to a literally meant proverb, though it needs more elaboration nowadays. One needs to add hair-styling gels, deodorants, six-packs, and God knows what else, to the mix to make the man. Almost the only thing that is totally redundant is character. Which means that the chap who said "When Wealth is lost, nothing is lost; when Health is lost, something is lost; when Character is lost, everything is lost" was also probably a contrarian and meant to say, "When Character is lost, nothing is lost; when Health is lost, something is lost; when Wealth is lost, everything is lost" - for, after all, without wealth, how can you get all those things that maketh a man?

So, then, what price 'All that glitters is not gold', you ask? Maybe so, but you can make quite a living selling gold bricks. They do say that "A fool and his money are easily parted" AND "A sucker is born every minute", so it does not matter whether what glitters is gold or not. (I KNOW, for I was the sucker of my birth minute). If you can make the world go around on pieces of paper, you can do it on gold bricks even if the contents do not match the glitter.

P.S: I owe a lot of this post to Titli's comment. As usual the (mis)representation is all mine.

20 comments:

  1. I guess all these proverbs and sayings are just the story of the father, son and the donkey spread across historic time lines. We have enough people telling us what to do with the donkey in our current times without looking to the words from those long gone to grave. But, yes, they are useful to substantiate our words by taking strength in hostoric backing when giving advice to someone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Proverbs are advice AND advice is ALWAYS like that TF :P

      Delete
  2. Well said and Truly agreed !!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The best part about preaching is that you don't have to necessarily follow it. Isn't this what preaching is all about?

    But my favourite has to be this quote by Jean Kerr - I'm tired of all this nonsense about beauty being only skin-deep. That's deep enough. What do you want—an adorable pancreas?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of, course - why do you think I chose preaching? It beats practicing any day :P

      Hahaha! Quite! An adorable pancreas seems oxymoronic :)

      Delete
  4. I like your version of 'Clothes maketh a man' and how you married it to wealth-shealth wala proverb. That was smart!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmm - sometimes it does happen by accident - my appearing smart :P

      Delete
  5. "Whatever else of the bestial nature has been rubbed out, what has not is the idea that anything that looks different is an enemy" - very well said! This has implications far and wide :) An enjoyable read!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quite right, Beloo, and I intended it that way - glad to know you noticed! "look, feel or behave different' it should have been BUT did not suit the proverb :)

      Delete
  6. Clothes maketh a man. but only clothes do not suffice , BRANDED clothes along with styling gel etc complete a person (real???).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah! It only means that the sort of clothes determines the man - my sort makes me out to be a vagabond :P

      Delete
  7. Adorable take on 'clothes make the man',it is true these days.Perhaps this phrase was coined when sapiens first began to wear clothes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Or, Indu, maybe they just got it wrong :) Intended saying "Man maketh clothes" and interchanged it :)

      Delete
  8. Agreed Suresh. This misrepresentation series is fun :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. hehehe I love your misinterpretations... sounds more interesting than the correct interpretations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Rajalakshmi! More like you and the day will come when the correct interpretations will be written as misinterpretations by some future blogger :)

      Delete
  10. And then, of course, there was Ravan, a man I greatly admire.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well - Have to agree that ten heads are better than none :P

      Delete